Leave a comment

Corruption in Courts is Real-I Have Proof

Now the federal courts are just making up the rules . . .show me the rule that requires leave of court to file a response to summary judgment.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1e_XAuP_K77T1BYUmd2N3BRdkU

Federal Bankruptcy Judge Russell Nelms issues two (2) orders to Judge J. Hennigan in the 324 Judicial in Tarrant County Texas, Family Divorce Court, to allow bankruptcy court to distribute marital property to ensure Texas State marital Law is NOT applied so that federal trustee can get paid:

The Judge Nelms Orders Directs Judge Hennigan to decide if RENTAL INCOME RECEIVED DURING MARRIAGE is COMMUNITY PROPERTY or SEPARATE PROPERTY under Texas Law.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77Vm5XckxXTm1mdlE/view?usp=sharing

The federal bankruptcy court then sent an order to the state divorce court ordering the state divorce court to decide how the state court would decide the divorce if he could…so that the federal court could decide how much property to divide between the federal bankruptcy trustee and my husband in the bankruptcy court.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77Vm5XckxXTm1mdlE/view?usp=sharing

Corruption of States Right’s Issue when Federal bankruptcy court ORDERS a Texas Family Court to ignore Texas Family Code and allow bankruptcy court to divide claimed marital property between federal trustee and the non-filing spouse (efforts to circumvent Tex. Fam. Code 3.201 & Tex. 3.202 & federal code 11 U.S.C. 726(c)(2)(C) which forbid s payment of debts incurred by one before marriage from property under the other spouse’s sole management and control. see also 11 U.SC. 541(a)(2)(A) & 11 U.S.C. 541(a)(2)(B); Cockerham v. Cockerham, 527 S.W. 2d 162 & See also Stern v. Marshall ..holding that federal bankruptcy court had no Constitutional Jurisdiction to interfere with Pure State Law Domestic claims like divorce and probate matters).

Ordering a Texas Court to ADVISE another court is a violation of TEX. CONST. art. II, § 1 see also United Services Life Insurance Company v. Delaney, 396 S.W.2d 855, 863 (Tex. 1965) and Tex. Ass’n of Business v. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 441(Tex. 1993) (internal citations omitted).

The 10th Amendment gives jurisdiction over divorce to Texas Court. All federal courts are prohibited by 28 USC 2283 from entering ANY ORDERS to interfere with a state Court proceeding….unless it has been expressly authorized by Congress.

11 usc 362(c)(2) “the STAY of any other act under subsection (a) of this section CONTINUES UNTIL the earliest of – (A) the time the case is closed; (B) the time the case is dismissed; or (C) if the case is a case under chapter 7 of this title concerning an individual or a case under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title, the time a DISCHARGE is GRANTED or denied; – (See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/11/3/IV/362#sthash.v0wLJxoy.dpuf)

THE ORDER OF DISCHARGE WAS GRANTED NOVEMBER 15, 2012 (11/15/12)

11 USC 362(j) On request of a party in interest, the court shall issue an order under subsection (c) confirming that the automatic stay has been terminated. – See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/11/3/IV/362#sthash.i0UeDs48.dpuf

Here are links to various other filings:

Corruption of States Right’s Issue when Federal bankruptcy court ORDERS a Texas Family Court to ignore Texas Family Code and allow bankruptcy court to divide claimed marital property between federal trustee and the non-filing spouse (efforts to circumvent Tex. Fam. Code 3.201 & Tex. 3.202 & federal code 11 U.S.C. 726(c)(2)(C) which forbid s payment of debts incurred by one before marriage from property under the other spouse’s sole management and control. see also 11 U.SC. 541(a)(2)(A) & 11 U.S.C. 541(a)(2)(B); Cockerham v. Cockerham, 527 S.W. 2d 162 & See also Stern v. Marshall ..holding that federal bankruptcy court had no Constitutional Jurisdiction to interfere with Pure State Law Domestic claims like divorce and probate matters).

Federal Bankruptcy court orders Texas Family Court to allow bankruptcy court to distribute marital property to ensure Texas State marital Law is NOT applied so that federal trustee can get paid:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77Vm5XckxXTm1mdlE/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77Vm5XckxXTm1mdlE/view?usp=sharing

Federal bankruptcy trustee admits that trustee is afraid that a Texas Family Court would correctly apply Texas law and federal bankruptcy trustee would not get paid:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77S3VNeEJwYVpZMVE/view?usp=sharing

Federal trustee asking court to take notice that it is just urban property and not “Park Cities” Property (Property is located at 4716 E. Lancaster Fort Worth Texas 76103):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77UWhKV05jMXRhaHM/view?usp=sharing

Transcript showing federal trustee submitted a FORGED Settlement agreement to Court in order to circumvent Texas Family Court:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1e_XAuP_K77cjZpT051S3MxZlE/view?usp=sharing

Link to all supporting documents, including certified transcripts, court orders, federal trustee report showing $1.02 in marital assets and eleven proofs of claim showing less than $30,000 in community debt and $150,000.00 in debt incurred before marriage that state and federal law prohibit from being paid from community property under the other spouse’s sole management (see 11 U.S.C. 726(c)(2)(C)) & 11 U.S.C. 541(a)(2)(A):
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B1e_XAuP_K77R2RIRGtvdVcwZzg&usp=sharing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: